Euro area vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Euro area
251.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Saint Kitts and Nevis
53,046 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
Euro area rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
2nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Euro area
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197219922013

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 53,046 current US$ per square kilometre against 251.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 52,794 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 210.7 times Euro area's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Euro area ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd of 2 groups.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre 2,692 current US$ per square kilometre 2,691 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 67.35 current US$ per square kilometre 1,742 current US$ per square kilometre 1,675 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 175.71 current US$ per square kilometre 4,462 current US$ per square kilometre 4,286 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Euro area or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 53,046 current US$ per square kilometre against 251.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2013.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Euro area and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
52,794 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
22 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2004.
How do Euro area and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Euro area ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/euro-area/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/euro-area/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Euro area vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.