Gambia vs Mauritius: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Gambia
7,194 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
7,147 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
16th
Mauritius rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Gambia
  • Mauritius
020.0k40.0k197119972023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 7,194 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,147 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 47 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Mauritius ahead.

Gambia ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 17th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 192.69 current US$ per square kilometre 1,519 current US$ per square kilometre 1,326 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 704.74 current US$ per square kilometre 2,325 current US$ per square kilometre 1,620 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 678.26 current US$ per square kilometre 6,209 current US$ per square kilometre 5,531 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 618.68 current US$ per square kilometre 13,554 current US$ per square kilometre 12,936 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 2,798 current US$ per square kilometre 18,632 current US$ per square kilometre 15,835 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 5,026 current US$ per square kilometre 1,217 current US$ per square kilometre 3,809 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Gambia or Mauritius?
Gambia, at 7,194 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,147 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Gambia and Mauritius?
47 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mauritius?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Mauritius rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Gambia ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 17th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Mauritius: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/gambia-the/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/gambia-the/mauritius/">Gambia vs Mauritius: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.