Guatemala vs Kenya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Guatemala
257.51 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
259.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
90th
Kenya rank
89th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kenya
0100200300400197119972023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 259.59 current US$ per square kilometre against 257.51 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Kenya ahead.

Guatemala ranks 90th and Kenya ranks 89th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kenya Difference Ahead
1970s 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre 15.24 current US$ per square kilometre 13.16 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 32.64 current US$ per square kilometre 69.91 current US$ per square kilometre 37.27 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 195.85 current US$ per square kilometre 74.44 current US$ per square kilometre 121.41 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 262.22 current US$ per square kilometre 121.41 current US$ per square kilometre 140.8 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 285.06 current US$ per square kilometre 263.41 current US$ per square kilometre 21.65 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 293.61 current US$ per square kilometre 235.68 current US$ per square kilometre 57.93 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Guatemala or Kenya?
Kenya, at 259.59 current US$ per square kilometre against 257.51 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Guatemala and Kenya?
2.08 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kenya?
43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Kenya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Guatemala ranks 90th and Kenya ranks 89th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kenya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/guatemala/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/guatemala/kenya/">Guatemala vs Kenya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.