IBRD only vs North Macedonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

IBRD only
203.88 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
North Macedonia
6,362 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
20th
North Macedonia rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • IBRD only
  • North Macedonia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 6,362 current US$ per square kilometre against 203.88 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 6,158 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 31.2 times IBRD only's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 20th and North Macedonia ranks 18th of 45 groups.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 34.46 current US$ per square kilometre 1,131 current US$ per square kilometre 1,096 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 52.76 current US$ per square kilometre 2,389 current US$ per square kilometre 2,336 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 91.96 current US$ per square kilometre 3,421 current US$ per square kilometre 3,329 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 145.85 current US$ per square kilometre 7,228 current US$ per square kilometre 7,082 current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, IBRD only or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 6,362 current US$ per square kilometre against 203.88 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between IBRD only and North Macedonia?
6,158 current US$ per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and North Macedonia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and North Macedonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
IBRD only ranks 20th and North Macedonia ranks 18th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs North Macedonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/ibrd-only/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/ibrd-only/north-macedonia/">IBRD only vs North Macedonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.