Kiribati vs Naoero: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Kiribati
9,142 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
10,622 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Kiribati rank
12th
Naoero rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Kiribati
  • Naoero
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k198120022023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 10,622 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,142 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 1,480 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 12th and Naoero ranks 11th of 170 countries.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Naoero Difference Ahead
2000s 5,157 current US$ per square kilometre 33,625 current US$ per square kilometre 28,468 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 3,885 current US$ per square kilometre 36,934 current US$ per square kilometre 33,048 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 6,818 current US$ per square kilometre 7,014 current US$ per square kilometre 195.85 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Kiribati or Naoero?
Naoero, at 10,622 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,142 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Kiribati and Naoero?
1,480 current US$ per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Naoero?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Kiribati and Naoero rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Kiribati ranks 12th and Naoero ranks 11th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Naoero: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/kiribati/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/kiribati/naoero/">Kiribati vs Naoero: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.