Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Kiribati
9,142 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
12,505 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Kiribati rank
12th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
9th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Kiribati
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
05.0k10.0k15.0k198020012023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 12,505 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,142 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 3,363 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.4 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 12th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 9th of 170 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 1,070 current US$ per square kilometre 56.14 current US$ per square kilometre 1,014 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 1,727 current US$ per square kilometre 938.01 current US$ per square kilometre 789.01 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 3,310 current US$ per square kilometre 2,043 current US$ per square kilometre 1,267 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Kiribati or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 12,505 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,142 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2007.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
3,363 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
23 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2007.
How do Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Kiribati ranks 12th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 9th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/kiribati/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/kiribati/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.