Liberia vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Liberia
620.76 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
621.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia rank
66th
Uganda rank
65th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Liberia
  • Uganda
05001.0k1.5k197119972023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 621.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 620.76 current US$ per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0.98 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Uganda ahead.

Liberia ranks 66th and Uganda ranks 65th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 61.36 current US$ per square kilometre 27.34 current US$ per square kilometre 34.02 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 49.29 current US$ per square kilometre 110.83 current US$ per square kilometre 61.54 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 129.8 current US$ per square kilometre 330.28 current US$ per square kilometre 200.48 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 333.13 current US$ per square kilometre 538.97 current US$ per square kilometre 205.84 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 697.82 current US$ per square kilometre 596.6 current US$ per square kilometre 101.22 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 423.08 current US$ per square kilometre 711.17 current US$ per square kilometre 288.09 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Liberia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 621.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 620.76 current US$ per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Liberia and Uganda?
0.98 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Uganda?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Liberia ranks 66th and Uganda ranks 65th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/liberia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/liberia/uganda/">Liberia vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.