Malawi vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Malawi
1,616 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
1,308 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
47th
Samoa rank
50th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Malawi
  • Samoa
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197119972023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 1,616 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,308 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 308 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Samoa ahead.

Malawi ranks 47th and Samoa ranks 50th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Samoa Difference Ahead
1970s 94.79 current US$ per square kilometre 554.77 current US$ per square kilometre 459.98 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 214.93 current US$ per square kilometre 1,085 current US$ per square kilometre 870.22 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 569.98 current US$ per square kilometre 970.67 current US$ per square kilometre 400.69 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 806.57 current US$ per square kilometre 1,743 current US$ per square kilometre 936.19 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 1,132 current US$ per square kilometre 3,608 current US$ per square kilometre 2,476 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 1,185 current US$ per square kilometre 465.13 current US$ per square kilometre 719.53 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Malawi or Samoa?
Malawi, at 1,616 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,308 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Malawi and Samoa?
308 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Samoa?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Malawi ranks 47th and Samoa ranks 50th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/malawi/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/malawi/samoa/">Malawi vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.