Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Malta
34,125 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Sao Tome and Principe
18,667 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
4th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
7th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Malta
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197319982023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 34,125 current US$ per square kilometre against 18,667 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 15,458 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.8 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 4th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th of 170 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 9,977 current US$ per square kilometre 611.98 current US$ per square kilometre 9,365 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 8,226 current US$ per square kilometre 2,556 current US$ per square kilometre 5,670 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 13,172 current US$ per square kilometre 3,255 current US$ per square kilometre 9,917 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 14,896 current US$ per square kilometre 4,646 current US$ per square kilometre 10,250 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Malta or Sao Tome and Principe?
Malta, at 34,125 current US$ per square kilometre against 18,667 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
15,458 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2002.
How do Malta and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Malta ranks 4th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.