Mexico vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Mexico
-38.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
-20.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Mexico rank
163rd
New Caledonia rank
162nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Mexico
  • New Caledonia
0200400196819952023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports -20.79 current US$ per square kilometre against -38.77 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 17.98 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Mexico ranks 163rd and New Caledonia ranks 162nd of 170 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre 46.72 current US$ per square kilometre 44.68 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre 33.59 current US$ per square kilometre 32.39 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre 174.23 current US$ per square kilometre 170.05 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Mexico or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at -20.79 current US$ per square kilometre against -38.77 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 1999.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Mexico and New Caledonia?
17.98 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and New Caledonia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1999.
How do Mexico and New Caledonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Mexico ranks 163rd and New Caledonia ranks 162nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/mexico/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/mexico/new-caledonia/">Mexico vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.