Moldova vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … square European Union institutions

Moldova
9,052 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
315.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Moldova rank
13th
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … square European Union institutions over time

  • Moldova
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 9,052 current US$ per square kilometre against 315.73 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 8,736 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Moldova's figure about 28.7 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 13th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 11th of 170 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1990s 230.63 current US$ per square kilometre 67.63 current US$ per square kilometre 163.01 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2000s 1,097 current US$ per square kilometre 159.46 current US$ per square kilometre 937.36 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2010s 4,179 current US$ per square kilometre 281.7 current US$ per square kilometre 3,897 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2020s 8,689 current US$ per square kilometre 313.82 current US$ per square kilometre 8,375 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Moldova or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
Moldova, at 9,052 current US$ per square kilometre against 315.73 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Moldova and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
8,736 current US$ per square kilometre, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Moldova and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Moldova ranks 13th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 11th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/moldova/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/moldova/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Moldova vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.