New Caledonia vs Turkmenistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions
New Caledonia
-20.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Turkmenistan
0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
162nd
Turkmenistan rank
159th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time
- New Caledonia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre against -20.79 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 21.07 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1994 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 162nd and Turkmenistan ranks 159th of 170 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, New Caledonia or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre against -20.79 current US$ per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between New Caledonia and Turkmenistan?
- 21.07 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Turkmenistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1999.
- How do New Caledonia and Turkmenistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- New Caledonia ranks 162nd and Turkmenistan ranks 159th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.