Nigeria vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Nigeria
129.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
137.22 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria rank
112th
Zambia rank
109th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Nigeria
  • Zambia
0100200300196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 137.22 current US$ per square kilometre against 129.08 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 109th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre 32.82 current US$ per square kilometre 30.1 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 24.7 current US$ per square kilometre 78.76 current US$ per square kilometre 54.06 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 70.89 current US$ per square kilometre 130.24 current US$ per square kilometre 59.35 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 164.62 current US$ per square kilometre 99.85 current US$ per square kilometre 64.77 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 156.89 current US$ per square kilometre 109.93 current US$ per square kilometre 46.96 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Nigeria or Zambia?
Zambia, at 137.22 current US$ per square kilometre against 129.08 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Nigeria and Zambia?
8.14 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Nigeria and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Nigeria ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 109th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/nigeria/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/nigeria/zambia/">Nigeria vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.