Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Sudan
70.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
92.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
122nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300197820002023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 92.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 21.98 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Sudan's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Sudan ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 170 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 60.71 current US$ per square kilometre 179.07 current US$ per square kilometre 118.36 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 77.72 current US$ per square kilometre 171.49 current US$ per square kilometre 93.77 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 92.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
21.98 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Sudan ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.