Tanzania vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … square European Union institutions

Tanzania
136.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
137.22 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania rank
110th
Zambia rank
109th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC … square European Union institutions over time

  • Tanzania
  • Zambia
050100150200197119972023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 137.22 current US$ per square kilometre against 136.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Zambia ahead.

Tanzania ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 109th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 14.79 current US$ per square kilometre 8.19 current US$ per square kilometre 6.6 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 38.53 current US$ per square kilometre 32.82 current US$ per square kilometre 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 71.91 current US$ per square kilometre 78.76 current US$ per square kilometre 6.85 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 158.17 current US$ per square kilometre 130.24 current US$ per square kilometre 27.93 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 142.26 current US$ per square kilometre 99.85 current US$ per square kilometre 42.42 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 129.81 current US$ per square kilometre 109.93 current US$ per square kilometre 19.88 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Tanzania or Zambia?
Zambia, at 137.22 current US$ per square kilometre against 136.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Tanzania and Zambia?
1.07 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Tanzania ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 109th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/tanzania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/tanzania/zambia/">Tanzania vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.