Aruba vs Cayman Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time
- Aruba
- Cayman Islands
How they compare
Aruba currently reports -40,000 current US$ against -180,000 current US$ in Cayman Islands, a difference of 140,000 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Aruba ranks 164th and Cayman Islands ranks 165th of 172 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Cayman Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Cayman Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30,000 current US$ | 520,000 current US$ | 490,000 current US$ | Cayman Islands |
| 1990s | 1.95 million current US$ | 276,667 current US$ | 1.67 million current US$ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Aruba or Cayman Islands?
- Aruba, at -40,000 current US$ against -180,000 current US$ in Cayman Islands as of 1999.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Aruba and Cayman Islands?
- 140,000 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Cayman Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1996.
- How do Aruba and Cayman Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Aruba ranks 164th and Cayman Islands ranks 165th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.