Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Eswatini
13.45 million current US$
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
13.79 million current US$
in 2013
Eswatini rank
112th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
111th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Eswatini
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197119972023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 13.79 million current US$ against 13.45 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 340,300 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 112th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 111th of 173 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 4.69 million current US$ 700,000 current US$ 3.99 million current US$ Eswatini
1990s 7.58 million current US$ 453,000 current US$ 7.13 million current US$ Eswatini
2000s 10.03 million current US$ 2.17 million current US$ 7.86 million current US$ Eswatini
2010s 25.07 million current US$ 14.57 million current US$ 10.50 million current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Eswatini or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 13.79 million current US$ against 13.45 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2013.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
340,300 current US$, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
31 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2013.
How do Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Eswatini ranks 112th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 111th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
220 places, 9,521 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.