Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
3.27 billion current US$
in 2022
Hungary
237.81 million current US$
in 2004
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
17th
Hungary rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Hungary
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B197019962022

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 3.27 billion current US$ against 237.81 million current US$ in Hungary, a difference of 3.03 billion current US$.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 13.7 times Hungary's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Hungary ranks 14th of 47 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 1.45 billion current US$ 98.95 million current US$ 1.35 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 1.79 billion current US$ 219.93 million current US$ 1.57 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Hungary?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 3.27 billion current US$ against 237.81 million current US$ in Hungary as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hungary?
3.03 billion current US$, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hungary?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hungary rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 17th and Hungary ranks 14th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hungary/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
220 places, 9,521 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.