IDA only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$)

IDA only
-18.09 % change on previous year
in 2022
Zimbabwe
44.79 % change on previous year
in 2023
IDA only rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) over time

  • IDA only
  • Zimbabwe
-2000200400600197219972023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 44.79 % change on previous year against -18.09 % change on previous year in IDA only, a difference of 62.88 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.5 times IDA only's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1981 it was IDA only ahead.

IDA only ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, IDA only averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 26.16 % change on previous year 34.32 % change on previous year 8.16 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1990s -7.38 % change on previous year 13.56 % change on previous year 20.94 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 14.94 % change on previous year 140.4 % change on previous year 125.46 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s -2.87 % change on previous year -12.36 % change on previous year 9.49 % change on previous year IDA only
2020s -0.3203 % change on previous year 113.35 % change on previous year 113.67 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), IDA only or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 44.79 % change on previous year against -18.09 % change on previous year in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) between IDA only and Zimbabwe?
62.88 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Zimbabwe?
40 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2022.
How do IDA only and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$)?
IDA only ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ida-only/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ida-only/zimbabwe/">IDA only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,934 data points, 1971–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.