Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 44.79 % change on previous year against -23.62 % change on previous year in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 68.41 % change on previous year.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 46 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 77.2 % change on previous year | 34.32 % change on previous year | 42.88 % change on previous year | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 1990s | -6.88 % change on previous year | 13.56 % change on previous year | 20.43 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 101.18 % change on previous year | 140.4 % change on previous year | 39.22 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 20.72 % change on previous year | -12.36 % change on previous year | 33.09 % change on previous year | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) |
| 2020s | -8.43 % change on previous year | 113.35 % change on previous year | 121.79 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 44.79 % change on previous year against -23.62 % change on previous year in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
- 68.41 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2022.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$)?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.