Bangladesh vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Bangladesh
599,380 current US$
in 2023
Latvia
580,000 current US$
in 2004
Bangladesh rank
55th
Latvia rank
58th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Bangladesh
- Latvia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 599,380 current US$ against 580,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 19,380 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 55th and Latvia ranks 58th of 146 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.47 million current US$ | 2.99 million current US$ | 480,000 current US$ | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 624,000 current US$ | 2.12 million current US$ | 1.50 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Bangladesh or Latvia?
- Bangladesh, at 599,380 current US$ against 580,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Bangladesh and Latvia?
- 19,380 current US$, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Bangladesh and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Bangladesh ranks 55th and Latvia ranks 58th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.