Barbados vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Barbados
-30,000 current US$
in 1998
Ecuador
726 current US$
in 2020
Barbados rank
143rd
Ecuador rank
140th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 726 current US$ against -30,000 current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 30,726 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Ecuador ahead.
Barbados ranks 143rd and Ecuador ranks 140th of 146 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 302,000 current US$ | 305,500 current US$ | 3,500 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 1990s | -104,444 current US$ | 111,111 current US$ | 215,556 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 726 current US$ against -30,000 current US$ in Barbados as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Ecuador?
- 30,726 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Ecuador?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1998.
- How do Barbados and Ecuador rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 143rd and Ecuador ranks 140th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.