Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps

Barbados
-30,000 current US$
in 1998
Hong Kong, China
-140,000 current US$
in 1996
Barbados rank
143rd
Hong Kong, China rank
144th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time

  • Barbados
  • Hong Kong, China
0500.0k1.0M1.5M198019891998

How they compare

Barbados currently reports -30,000 current US$ against -140,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 110,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Barbados ranks 143rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 144th of 146 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 420,000 current US$ 38,000 current US$ 382,000 current US$ Barbados
1990s -112,857 current US$ 275,000 current US$ 387,857 current US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Hong Kong, China?
Barbados, at -30,000 current US$ against -140,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 1998.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Hong Kong, China?
110,000 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Hong Kong, China?
12 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 1996.
How do Barbados and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
Barbados ranks 143rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 144th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/barbados/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/barbados/hong-kong-sar-china/">Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,075 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.