Burundi vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Burundi
- Libya
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 874,857 current US$ against 821,853 current US$ in Libya, a difference of 53,004 current US$.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 46th and Libya ranks 48th of 146 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 340,000 current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | Libya |
| 2010s | 658,029 current US$ | 810,645 current US$ | 152,616 current US$ | Libya |
| 2020s | 1.17 million current US$ | 785,891 current US$ | 380,992 current US$ | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Burundi or Libya?
- Burundi, at 874,857 current US$ against 821,853 current US$ in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Burundi and Libya?
- 53,004 current US$, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Libya?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Libya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Burundi ranks 46th and Libya ranks 48th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.