Cape Verde vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Cape Verde
- Singapore
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Singapore, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.5 times Singapore's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 115th and Singapore ranks 118th of 146 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 30,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Cape Verde |
| 1980s | 666,000 current US$ | 34,000 current US$ | 632,000 current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Cape Verde or Singapore?
- Cape Verde, at 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Singapore as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Cape Verde and Singapore?
- 10,000 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1988.
- How do Cape Verde and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Cape Verde ranks 115th and Singapore ranks 118th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.