Chad vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Chad
1.18 million current US$
in 2016
Georgia
1.23 million current US$
in 2023
Chad rank
38th
Georgia rank
36th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Chad
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1.23 million current US$ against 1.18 million current US$ in Chad, a difference of 44,760 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Chad ranks 38th and Georgia ranks 36th of 146 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.80 million current US$ | 1.53 million current US$ | 276,500 current US$ | Chad |
| 2010s | 2.78 million current US$ | 2.96 million current US$ | 179,360 current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Chad or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 1.23 million current US$ against 1.18 million current US$ in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Chad and Georgia?
- 44,760 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Georgia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Chad and Georgia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Chad ranks 38th and Georgia ranks 36th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.