Congo vs Haiti: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Congo
- Haiti
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1.37 million current US$ against 1.26 million current US$ in Haiti, a difference of 107,580 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 34th and Haiti ranks 35th of 146 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Haiti in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 105,000 current US$ | 45,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 72,500 current US$ | 406,000 current US$ | 333,500 current US$ | Haiti |
| 2010s | 18,397 current US$ | 4.13 million current US$ | 4.12 million current US$ | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Congo or Haiti?
- Congo, at 1.37 million current US$ against 1.26 million current US$ in Haiti as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Congo and Haiti?
- 107,580 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Haiti?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2016.
- How do Congo and Haiti rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Congo ranks 34th and Haiti ranks 35th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.