Ecuador vs Montenegro: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Ecuador
- Montenegro
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 726 current US$ against 557 current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 169 current US$.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Montenegro ahead.
Ecuador ranks 140th and Montenegro ranks 141st of 146 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.08 million current US$ | 466,667 current US$ | 616,667 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 632,401 current US$ | 19,399 current US$ | 613,002 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Ecuador or Montenegro?
- Ecuador, at 726 current US$ against 557 current US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Ecuador and Montenegro?
- 169 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Ecuador ranks 140th and Montenegro ranks 141st of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.