Ethiopia vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland gaps over time
- Ethiopia
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 27.58 million current US$ against 25.39 million current US$ in Ethiopia, a difference of 2.19 million current US$.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 4th and Russia ranks 3rd of 146 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.31 million current US$ | 14.48 million current US$ | 7.17 million current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 6.70 million current US$ | 16.04 million current US$ | 9.33 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Ethiopia or Russia?
- Russia, at 27.58 million current US$ against 25.39 million current US$ in Ethiopia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Ethiopia and Russia?
- 2.19 million current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Ethiopia and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Ethiopia ranks 4th and Russia ranks 3rd of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.