Lesotho vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Lesotho
11,802 current US$
in 2018
Samoa
10,000 current US$
in 1986
Lesotho rank
125th
Samoa rank
127th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Lesotho
- Samoa
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 11,802 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 1,802 current US$.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Samoa ahead.
Lesotho ranks 125th and Samoa ranks 127th of 146 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 26,667 current US$ | 23,333 current US$ | 3,333 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 512,143 current US$ | 42,857 current US$ | 469,286 current US$ | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Lesotho or Samoa?
- Lesotho, at 11,802 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Samoa as of 2018.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Lesotho and Samoa?
- 1,802 current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Samoa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1986.
- How do Lesotho and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Lesotho ranks 125th and Samoa ranks 127th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.