Liberia vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Liberia
- Poland
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 139,946 current US$ against 130,000 current US$ in Poland, a difference of 9,946 current US$.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Liberia ranks 84th and Poland ranks 87th of 146 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 603,000 current US$ | 9.60 million current US$ | 8.99 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 845,000 current US$ | -242,500 current US$ | 1.09 million current US$ | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Liberia or Poland?
- Liberia, at 139,946 current US$ against 130,000 current US$ in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Liberia and Poland?
- 9,946 current US$, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2003.
- How do Liberia and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Liberia ranks 84th and Poland ranks 87th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.