Montenegro vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Montenegro
- Suriname
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 557 current US$ against 467 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 90 current US$.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 142nd of 146 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 466,667 current US$ | 68,333 current US$ | 398,333 current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 19,399 current US$ | 33,941 current US$ | 14,543 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Montenegro or Suriname?
- Montenegro, at 557 current US$ against 467 current US$ in Suriname as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Montenegro and Suriname?
- 90 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Montenegro and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Montenegro ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 142nd of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.