Mozambique vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps

Mozambique
17.81 million current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
210.29 million current US$
in 2023
Mozambique rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time

  • Mozambique
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M197019962023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 210.29 million current US$ against 17.81 million current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 192.48 million current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 11.8 times Mozambique's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 146 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 1.36 million current US$ 19.69 million current US$ 18.32 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 8.65 million current US$ 99.10 million current US$ 90.45 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 15.53 million current US$ 123.30 million current US$ 107.77 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 25.07 million current US$ 160.30 million current US$ 135.23 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 27.03 million current US$ 254.63 million current US$ 227.60 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 17.44 million current US$ 208.65 million current US$ 191.20 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Mozambique or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 210.29 million current US$ against 17.81 million current US$ in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Mozambique and Sub-Saharan Africa?
192.48 million current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sub-Saharan Africa?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
Mozambique ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/mozambique/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/mozambique/sub-saharan-africa/">Mozambique vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,075 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.