Nigeria vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Nigeria
135,501 current US$
in 2023
Poland
130,000 current US$
in 2003
Nigeria rank
86th
Poland rank
87th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Nigeria
- Poland
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 135,501 current US$ against 130,000 current US$ in Poland, a difference of 5,501 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Nigeria ranks 86th and Poland ranks 87th of 146 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 174,500 current US$ | 9.60 million current US$ | 9.42 million current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 197,500 current US$ | -242,500 current US$ | 440,000 current US$ | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Nigeria or Poland?
- Nigeria, at 135,501 current US$ against 130,000 current US$ in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Nigeria and Poland?
- 5,501 current US$, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2003.
- How do Nigeria and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Nigeria ranks 86th and Poland ranks 87th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.