Saudi Arabia vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 67,407 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 7,407 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Uruguay ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 102nd of 146 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30,000 current US$ | 16,000 current US$ | 14,000 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 40,000 current US$ | 43,333 current US$ | 3,333 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, Saudi Arabia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 67,407 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between Saudi Arabia and Uruguay?
- 7,407 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1992.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 102nd of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.