South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
45.66 million current US$
in 2022
Zimbabwe
1.73 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
28th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps over time

  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197119972023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 45.66 million current US$ against 1.73 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 43.93 million current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 26.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 46 groups.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 19.22 million current US$ 3.48 million current US$ 15.75 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1990s 26.55 million current US$ 5.43 million current US$ 21.11 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 37.17 million current US$ 945,000 current US$ 36.22 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 64.08 million current US$ 1.69 million current US$ 62.39 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 53.71 million current US$ 886,449 current US$ 52.83 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) or Zimbabwe?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 45.66 million current US$ against 1.73 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps between South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
43.93 million current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 28th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-gaps-filled/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/zimbabwe/">South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,075 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.