Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per

Barbados
-69.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1998
Hong Kong, China
-133.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Barbados rank
144th
Hong Kong, China rank
145th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Hong Kong, China
-50005001.0k1.5k2.0k198019891998

How they compare

Barbados currently reports -69.77 current US$ per square kilometre against -133.33 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 63.56 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 144th and Hong Kong, China ranks 145th of 145 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 1,085 current US$ per square kilometre 57.24 current US$ per square kilometre 1,028 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s -240.31 current US$ per square kilometre 216.5 current US$ per square kilometre 456.81 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, Barbados or Hong Kong, China?
Barbados, at -69.77 current US$ per square kilometre against -133.33 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 1998.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between Barbados and Hong Kong, China?
63.56 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Hong Kong, China?
9 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 1996.
How do Barbados and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 144th and Hong Kong, China ranks 145th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/hong-kong-sar-china/">Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 6,568 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.