Central Europe and the Baltics vs Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.3351 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Croatia
6.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
37th
Croatia rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Croatia
0255075100125199020002010

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3351 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Croatia's figure about 19.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 37th and Croatia ranks 37th of 46 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 16.74 current US$ per square kilometre 12.99 current US$ per square kilometre 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.3351 current US$ per square kilometre 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or Croatia?
Croatia, at 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3351 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2010.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and Croatia?
6.27 current US$ per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Croatia?
14 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Croatia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 37th and Croatia ranks 37th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/croatia/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 6,568 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.