East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Latvia
9.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
32nd
Latvia rank
30th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Latvia
050100150197119962022

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 9.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 7.67 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 5.7 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd and Latvia ranks 30th of 46 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre 48.05 current US$ per square kilometre 45.84 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre 34.13 current US$ per square kilometre 32.56 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Latvia?
Latvia, at 9.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
7.67 current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd and Latvia ranks 30th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 6,568 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.