East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific
1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
6.3 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
36th
Zambia rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Zambia
0204060197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 1 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 6.3 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 38th of 46 groups.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0679 current US$ per square kilometre 4.56 current US$ per square kilometre 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.6515 current US$ per square kilometre 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre 18.96 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre 20.54 current US$ per square kilometre 18.93 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre 13.86 current US$ per square kilometre 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre 23.75 current US$ per square kilometre 21.93 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 5.64 current US$ per square kilometre 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or Zambia?
Zambia, at 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 1 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
5.3 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 36th and Zambia ranks 38th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/zambia/">East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 6,568 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.