Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per

Eswatini
0.8366 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.8485 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Eswatini rank
87th
Nicaragua rank
85th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Nicaragua
050100150200197519992023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.8485 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8366 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Eswatini ranks 87th and Nicaragua ranks 85th of 145 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5814 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6648 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0834 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre 85.99 current US$ per square kilometre 84.36 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre 143.79 current US$ per square kilometre 140.11 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 9.88 current US$ per square kilometre 124.45 current US$ per square kilometre 114.57 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 21.1 current US$ per square kilometre 57.71 current US$ per square kilometre 36.61 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 32.61 current US$ per square kilometre 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre 30.83 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, Eswatini or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 0.8485 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8366 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between Eswatini and Nicaragua?
0.0119 current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nicaragua?
26 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Nicaragua rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 87th and Nicaragua ranks 85th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nicaragua/">Eswatini vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 6,568 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.