Guinea-Bissau vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per

Guinea-Bissau
5.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
OECD members
0.0343 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau rank
45th
OECD members rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • OECD members
0102030197119962022

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0343 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 154.0 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 45th and OECD members ranks 44th of 145 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 0.889 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0023 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8868 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0339 current US$ per square kilometre 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 6.58 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3007 current US$ per square kilometre 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 17.54 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1316 current US$ per square kilometre 17.41 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 16.09 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1155 current US$ per square kilometre 15.97 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, Guinea-Bissau or OECD members?
Guinea-Bissau, at 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0343 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2013.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between Guinea-Bissau and OECD members?
5.24 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and OECD members?
13 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2013.
How do Guinea-Bissau and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 45th and OECD members ranks 44th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/oecd-members/">Guinea-Bissau vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 6,568 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.