Mozambique vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per

Mozambique
22.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
25.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
21st
Rwanda rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per over time

  • Mozambique
  • Rwanda
0255075100197419982023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 25.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.65 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mozambique ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 19th of 145 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1144 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4054 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2909 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 12.68 current US$ per square kilometre 20.17 current US$ per square kilometre 7.48 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 19.75 current US$ per square kilometre 37.17 current US$ per square kilometre 17.42 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 31.87 current US$ per square kilometre 36.89 current US$ per square kilometre 5.01 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 34.37 current US$ per square kilometre 7.73 current US$ per square kilometre 26.64 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 22.18 current US$ per square kilometre 16.49 current US$ per square kilometre 5.7 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, Mozambique or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 25.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.65 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between Mozambique and Rwanda?
2.54 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?
43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
Mozambique ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 19th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/rwanda/">Mozambique vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 6,568 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.