South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland unit

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
19th
Tanzania rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland … Finland unit over time

  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
  • Tanzania
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197119972023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 15.5 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 19th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 46 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1980s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0032 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0029 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2010s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per between South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Tanzania?
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Tanzania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 19th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-finland-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/tanzania/">South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,477 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.