Barbados vs Brunei: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps
Barbados
30,000 current US$
in 2010
Brunei
70,000 current US$
in 1995
Barbados rank
150th
Brunei rank
147th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps over time
- Barbados
- Brunei
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 70,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 40,000 current US$.
That makes Brunei's figure about 2.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 150th and Brunei ranks 147th of 168 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Brunei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 34,286 current US$ | 54,286 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Brunei |
| 1990s | 16,667 current US$ | 121,667 current US$ | 105,000 current US$ | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Brunei?
- Brunei, at 70,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Barbados as of 1995.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Brunei?
- 40,000 current US$, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Brunei?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 1995.
- How do Barbados and Brunei rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 150th and Brunei ranks 147th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.