Brazil vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps
Brazil
31.27 million current US$
in 2023
Russia
31.89 million current US$
in 2004
Brazil rank
53rd
Russia rank
51st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps over time
- Brazil
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 31.89 million current US$ against 31.27 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 624,900 current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 53rd and Russia ranks 51st of 168 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.89 million current US$ | 22.51 million current US$ | 12.62 million current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 24.18 million current US$ | 24.28 million current US$ | 100,000 current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Brazil or Russia?
- Russia, at 31.89 million current US$ against 31.27 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Brazil and Russia?
- 624,900 current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Brazil and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Brazil ranks 53rd and Russia ranks 51st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.