Democratic Republic of Congo vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps

Democratic Republic of Congo
87.23 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members
673.54 million current US$
in 2022
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
29th
OECD members rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • OECD members
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196619942023

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 673.54 million current US$ against 87.23 million current US$ in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 586.31 million current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 7.7 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was OECD members ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 29th and OECD members ranks 29th of 168 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and OECD members in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 15.25 million current US$ 6.88 million current US$ 8.36 million current US$ Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 42.15 million current US$ 61.64 million current US$ 19.49 million current US$ OECD members
1990s 36.11 million current US$ 326.31 million current US$ 290.21 million current US$ OECD members
2000s 161.28 million current US$ 231.64 million current US$ 70.36 million current US$ OECD members
2010s 133.51 million current US$ 493.20 million current US$ 359.69 million current US$ OECD members
2020s 56.51 million current US$ 677.01 million current US$ 620.51 million current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Democratic Republic of Congo or OECD members?
OECD members, at 673.54 million current US$ against 87.23 million current US$ in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Democratic Republic of Congo and OECD members?
586.31 million current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and OECD members?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 29th and OECD members ranks 29th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/oecd-members/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,365 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.