Czechia vs Myanmar: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Czechia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 11.39 million current US$ against 9.96 million current US$ in Myanmar, a difference of 1.43 million current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Myanmar ahead.
Czechia ranks 80th and Myanmar ranks 82nd of 168 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.10 million current US$ | 3.15 million current US$ | 5.95 million current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 8.31 million current US$ | 1.41 million current US$ | 6.90 million current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Czechia or Myanmar?
- Czechia, at 11.39 million current US$ against 9.96 million current US$ in Myanmar as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Czechia and Myanmar?
- 1.43 million current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Myanmar?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Myanmar rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Czechia ranks 80th and Myanmar ranks 82nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.