Gibraltar vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Gibraltar
10,000 current US$
in 1998
Samoa
5,913 current US$
in 2021
Gibraltar rank
154th
Samoa rank
156th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Gibraltar
- Samoa
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 10,000 current US$ against 5,913 current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 4,087 current US$.
That makes Gibraltar's figure about 1.7 times Samoa's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 154th and Samoa ranks 156th of 168 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 13,333 current US$ | 347,500 current US$ | 334,167 current US$ | Samoa |
| 1990s | 21,111 current US$ | 257,778 current US$ | 236,667 current US$ | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Gibraltar or Samoa?
- Gibraltar, at 10,000 current US$ against 5,913 current US$ in Samoa as of 1998.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Gibraltar and Samoa?
- 4,087 current US$, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Samoa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 1998.
- How do Gibraltar and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Gibraltar ranks 154th and Samoa ranks 156th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.