Hong Kong vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps over time
- Hong Kong
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 2.22 million current US$ against 2.06 million current US$ in Hong Kong, a difference of 157,110 current US$.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 111th and Malawi ranks 109th of 168 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.42 million current US$ | 3.18 million current US$ | 1.76 million current US$ | Malawi |
| 1990s | 2.19 million current US$ | 6.68 million current US$ | 4.48 million current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Hong Kong or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 2.22 million current US$ against 2.06 million current US$ in Hong Kong as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Hong Kong and Malawi?
- 157,110 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malawi?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1996.
- How do Hong Kong and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Hong Kong ranks 111th and Malawi ranks 109th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.